ARTI members can avail of an insurance facility with Glennon Insurance which offers indemnity for Combined Medical Malpractice, Public and Products Liability Insurance.
The current annual premium payable is €203.75 for a €1,000,000 aggregate Limit of Indemnity
Members can avail of this facility by contacting Glennons at 01-7075800 or by email email@example.com
The crew at Glennons are most helpful and quick in processing requests.
In order to secure your insurance, you will need to:
- Ensure you are an ARTI member by paying your ARTI membership fee on http://arti.info/
(If you sat and passed the ARTI exam in 2017, the fee paid included ARTI membership for this coming year)
- If you are a new ARTI member that passed your ARTI certification exam, make sure you scan or post a copy of your up-to-date EFR cert, CFR cert and your transcripts from an ARTI accredited program to firstname.lastname@example.org
- Don’t forget to take note of your ARTI membership number (this is the same number as your ARTI certification exam number).Make contact with Glennons
- They will send you a contract that you must fill in and return
- Pay the premium
Remember without professional indemnity insurance your ARTI membership is invalid!
The ARTI AGM was held last week and marks the beginning of another ARTI membership year. The AGM proved very successful, one of great innovation and positivity and thanks to all members that attended. Following the AGM, there have been some changes made to the executive committee effective as and from Tuesday 15th August 2017. For this ARTI membership year 2017/18, the executive is as follows:
- President – Mr Andrew Watson
- Vice President – Mr Paul Berry
- Secretary – Mr Richie Walsh
- Assistant Secretary – Ms Hazel Cooney
- PRO – Dr Siobhán O’Connor
- Vice PRO – Ms Hannah Tallon
- Treasurer – Mr Michael Donohoe
- Vice Treasurer – Mr Tom Quinn
- Executive Member – Mr Enda Whyte
Find our contact info at http://arti.info/contact-us/
We’d like to thank the outgoing officers for their commitment, hard work and huge achievements during their term. We wish the newly elected committee good luck in this coming year.
(Please use links provided to access the material via BJSM)
TQ: “What are the most significant changes or updates to the consensus statement on concussion in sport that would be of interest to ARTC’s working in sport at all levels?”
DG: “Several papers have emerged from the 5th Consensus. The overall summary would be that the SCAT5 provides “the most well established and rigorously developed instrument for sideline testing”. This is true.
One of the most important outcomes of the Berlin Conference is the publication of not only their findings but thorough descriptions of how such vital guidelines were built. The highest scientific standard was adhered too for the purpose of transparency and quality. Clinicians should now be appropriately comfortable and confident with the SCAT based on several versions now being common practice. All previous versions should be removed from circulation and best practice should be parallel to the SCAT5, Child SCAT5 and CRT5.
Some of the most significant changes include changes to the……
- There are 11 ‘R’s’ to the management of sports related concussion. The statement is laid out by each ‘R’ (recognise, remove, re-evaluate, rest, rehabilitation, refer, recovery, return to sport, reconsider, residual effects and sequelae, risk reduction). (They have laid the document in a very concise manner all italic writing demonstrating new or changed opinion).
Further changes to the definition
- The best approach to the recognition of SRC is a multidimensional test guided by the exert consensus.
- The SCAT is best utilised immediately after injury with its utility decreasing significantly from 3-5 days post injury.
- The symptom checklist is beneficial in tracking recovery.
- Baseline testing may be useful but not necessary for interpreting post injury data.
- Additional testing that can be helpful includes timed reaction testing, gait/balance assessment, video observable signs and oculomotor screening.
- When concussion is suspected the athlete should be removed and tested with a multidimensional assessment.
- Sporting bodies should allow adequate time for this assessment (10 min) and provide and adequate environment both on and off-field.
- Rule changes may need to occur in some sports to allow for this without unduly penalising the injured players team or the flow of the game.
- The final determination regarding a sports related concussion diagnosis and/or fitness to play is a medical decision based on clinical judgement.
- A return to school strategy table has been provided.
- Advanced neuroimaging, biomarkers and genetic testing are valuable research tools but still require further validation in SRC evaluation.
- There is currently insufficient evidence that complete rest is required. After a brief acute period of rest (24-48hrs) patients can be encouraged to become gradually more active while staying below their cognitive and physical symptom threshold. The exact amounts are not yet well defined and further research is required.
- Literature has not yet evaluated early interventions for rehabilitation as most recover in 10-14 days. Data supports interventions that include psychological cervical and vestibular rehabilitation. Closely monitored active rehabilitation that includes controlled submaximal exercise at sub-symptom-threshold level has shown to be safe and beneficial. The evidence around this and several other areas of rehabilitation requires further work.
- A whole section has been added in as persistent symptoms under “refer”. It is suggested that a definition should be determined for post-concussive symptoms which occurs (10-14 days adults, >4 weeks children) beyond typical recovery.
- The best predictor for slower recovery is the severity of symptoms initially. A new paragraph has been added which makes specific reference to those with a history of migranes, mental health or ADHA.
- Establishing time to recovery has also been a significant addition but remains a grey area.
- A specific call has been made that the next consensus should have adequate evidence for children. It has suggested that schools should have a concussion policy that includes education on SRC prevention and management for teachers, staff, students, parents and should offer appropriate academic accommodation and support during a students recovery. Children should not return to sport until they have returned to school.
- The literature on neurobehavioral sequelae and long-term consequences of repeated head trauma is inconsistent. The potential to develop Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy must be considered…….a cause-and-effect relationship has not yet been demonstrated between CTE and SRC or exposure to contact sports.
- A significant addition has been made in the area of prevention detailing emerging research.
- The conclusion states “while agreement exists on the principal messages conveyed by this document the authors acknowledge that the science of concussion is incomplete and therefore management and return to play decisions lie largely in the realm of clinical judgement on an individualised basis.”
TQ: “What are the main differences or practical implications between the Scat 5 (new edition) and previous edition (Scat 4)?”
DB: “The SCAT5 is very similar to the previous. This was a decision based on its world-wide use, common understanding and familiarity. The changes are outlined in box 1 SCAT 5 modifications. Changes include but are not limited to; a declaration that it cannot be completed in less than 10 min. Indications for emergency management, clarified symptom checklist instructions, additional post injury questions, SAC 10 word option. A notation of the last word recall time. A rapid neurological screen has been included, return to sport states rest should last no longer than 24-48hr. A school progression has been added and specific indication that return to sport should occur only by written approval by a healthcare professional.”
“THE MOST SIGNIFICANT ADDITION IS THE NEUROLOGICAL SCREEN WHICH INCLUDES READING AND EYE MOVEMENTS AMONGST OTHERS.”
TQ: “Can you tell us briefly about the CRT5 and its relevance for non-medical practitioners involved in sport?”
DB: “The CRT5 is again a follow up document. It is for the lay-person and should not be used for a diagnosis. It is to recognise possible SRC and to lead to appropriate steps and action taken if one is suspected. Little research has been conducted on its utility of efficacy. Again this presents another call for research by the CISG.
Key modifications include that it is not a diagnosis, greater emphasis for recognise and remove, expansion of red flags, immediate referral points, list of signs and symptoms, awareness questions and cautions regarding acute management and restrictions on behaviours.
It of course is a helpful tool as long as it is utilised. It should be widely disseminated. It provides instructions with clear language for the lay person thus assisting in the identification and care of concussion in many populations.”
TQ: “Are there any new emerging trends in concussion research that may have future potential to help with our diagnosis of concussion?”
DB: “Several references were made to video analysis and other diagnostic tests (that don’t yet have sufficient power to support their use). Although force sensor analysis was discussed again there is a lack of consistent evidence to support its use. Further mention was given to sophisticated areas of research such as neuroimaging, genetic testing, pharmacology and fluid biomarkers to assist in diagnosis but again insufficient evidence is currently available.”
TQ: “Return to learning/work and return to play is an extremely important aspect for practitioners using the SCAT 5. Can ARTC’s working in sport be confident that the SCAT 5 is sufficient in this regard? or would you recommend using the SCAT 5 in conjunction with other concussion assessment tools such as the VOMS (vestibular/ocular motor screening assessment)?”
DB: “The consensus outlines that medical practitioners must use experience and judgement. This adds to their suggestion that the SCAT5 is the most robustly testing assessment strategy available but others may be used in addition to the SCAT5 to further inform the clinician. I think the additional of reading and eye-movement to the SCAT5 is a significant development which can be viewed at a nod towards further assessment in these areas for example VOMS. With any additional testing it is important to consider the population and the practitioners understanding and training to utilise a test correctly and effectively. Though they may not have appropriate power and be lacking in quality in areas, there is certainly research to support other methods of testing. I think the area of vestibular and oculomotor examination will continue to have positive findings in support of their use”.
TQ: “Dearbhla, on behalf of the ARTI board I would like to thank you very much for your time and for this invaluable information that is of such great importance to our members.”
A dry needling course for ARTI members will be running in July and August 2017 in DCU. This is a world class Trigger Point Dry Needling Course presented by Dr Johnston McEvoy of the David G Simmons Academy.
The first part of this bi-modular (DN1 & DN2) course will commence on July 6th.
The course will be held over 6 days, which is separated into two 3 day periods, totalling 48 CPD hours.
Dry Needling 1: July 6th, 7th 8th (Thurs, Fri, Sat) 2017
Dry Needling 2: August 24th, 25th 26th (Thurs, Fri, Sat) 2017
EFR refresher course – This is essential for all ARTC’s to maintain their EFR certification. Contact Hazel Cooney for more details 087 9052926.
Hip and Groin Pain in Sport (2 day workshop) with Phil Glasgow available to ARTI members. See following link for more details. Cost – 275.00 euro.
This highly practical two-day course will enable participants to enhance their assessment, treatment and rehabilitation skills in the management of sport-related hip and groin pain. Course participants will learn about pathomechanics of pelvic function and its role in high-speed activities such as running, kicking and throwing. Hip and groin pain in sport will be discussed and a sport specific approach to assessment will be taught to improve physical examination and diagnostic skills. Sport specific treatment techniques to address specific dysfunctions will be taught. This will include manual techniques for both the joints and the muscle-tendon unit as well as exercise interventions. This course will provide participants will the skills necessary to retrain appropriate movement patterns, enhance energy transfer and restore sport-specific function.
Two ARTI members will be conducting workshops as part of this month’s FSEM Annual Scientific Conference 2016.
The highly regarded annual conference, which is supported by ARTI, will take place in the RSCI from September 15 to 17, and will feature workshops from Dearbhla Gallagher and Diarmaid Brennan.
Dearbhla’s topic is entitled, “Risk factors and modifiers – application of concussion tools” and will take place on Thursday September 15 from 3pm to 5pm. Meanwhile Diarmaid’s workshop is on “Prevention and Rehabilitation of Hamstring injuries”, and will be conducted on Saturday at 2pm. Given the topical nature of both talks they are sure to attract great interest among those attending the conference.
Concussion is Dearbhla’s area of special interest and she decided on this particular topic for the workshop due to her concern in relation to concussion for those at grassroots and school sport particularly among female and child athletes.
“There are several problems that those in these groups face but I believe that many of these can be solved by identifying risk factors and modifiers of concussion injury and how these can be applied to useful tests”, she stated and explained that the workshop will look at several tests that can facilitate a concussion assessment.
“The Standardised Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) is the industry wide endorser tool and is due for review this October at the 5th International Concussion in Sport Conference. Several advances in research suggest there will be several likely changes to the test in the months after the conference. The SCAT has several limitations that clinicians should understand and take into consideration during utilisation of the test both in the immediate aftermath of the concussive event and in the rehabilitation/return to sport process. Many of these limitations can be remedied with other complimentary tools”, added Dearbhla.
Dearbhla, who graduated from the Athletic Therapy and Training programme in DCU in 2010 and is an Alumni of the Placement at University of Pittsburgh (USA), is currently combining private clinical work in London while studying for a PhD in Concussion at St Mary’s University London.
She believes this workshop will be of benefit to clinicians as it is vital to keep up with advances in this area.
“With hundreds of articles released every month on concussion, it is important to review the current evidence regularly. The Consensus Statement on Concussion is released every four years but during these periods advances in clinical knowledge should not cease as it is highly likely that major evidence could emerge during these times whereby care of the concussed athlete be advanced and be up to date”, she stated.
The workshop will no doubt provide very useful information for clinicians as Dearbhla reveals.
“I am aiming to provide emerging and up to date evidence from a applied practitioner stand point for the assessment and rehabilitation of concussion – not just endorsed information. Combining the evidence and the application of current and available (reliable and valid) tools in order to leave with practical information that can be implemented in a variety of settings”, she explained.
Meanwhile, Diarmaid’s workshop is also expected to be very popular given that he will discuss another important topic – that of hamstring injury prevention and rehab.
It is an area that Diarmaid is very familiar with in his role as Senior Injury & Rehabilitation Coach with Leinster Rugby, and sharing his knowledge will benefit those in attendance.
He will discuss various types of strains from the severe Grade 3 to the less serious from the viewpoint of prevention and rehabilitation.
“I am looking forward to the workshop as I think it will be interesting as it covers different levels of hamstring injury. I will discussing at the return to play process and how to benchmark where a player should be at a particular time in relation to recovery”, revealed Diarmaid who graduated from Carlow IT with a degree in Sports Rehabilitation and also runs the DB Sports Injury Clinic.
“I think the workshop will be of benefit to everyone and hopefully they will find it interesting. How to differentiate the types of hamstring strain, how to load them and exercise selection are the main components of the workshop.
“I will look at area such as when the athlete is ready to run and what exercise is best as this is a big part of the rehab”, explained Diarmaid.
For full details on the FSEM Annual Scientific Conference 2016 visit http://fsem2016.com/
EFR/CPR refresher course (2 days) is being held on the the 23rd and 24th of August in DCU. This is extremely important for ARTI members who need to renew their EFR/CPR certification as EFR is valid for a period of 3 years and is a requirement for all ARTC’s.
Please contact Tom Quinn ARTC for further details – 087 7515480